[mc1322x] 6LowPAN data payload

Jon Smirl jonsmirl at gmail.com
Tue Jul 13 14:47:08 EDT 2010


On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Mariano Alvira <mar at devl.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:05:26PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>
>> There is a 6lowpan fragmentation spec
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6lowpan-simple-fragment-recovery-07
>
> That's for individual 6LowPAN frag recovery right? Contiki could
> really use that...

Yes. Especially if you use RF23x devices that drop packets. If you are
working on fragmentation take a look at it and see how hard it is to
add.

> BTW, Jon, the PPP vs SLIP discussion came up on the Contiki list a
> while back. As I understand it, someone added PPP but that code
> eventually was broken with core changes and no one went back to pick
> it up again. It's probably still around in backyard or projects or
> something...

PPP/SLIP are adding an unnecessary layer of complexity. For example
I'm not sure yet if they work right for IPv6.  It also makes routing
more complex. Now the 802.15.4 LAN is hooked to the Ethernet LAN by a
PTP link instead of a direct connection. Broadcast packets are not
normally forwarded over PTP links so radvd is messed up. All of this
is making me learn a lot more about IPv6 than I wanted to.


>
> -Mar.
>



-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com



More information about the mc1322x mailing list