[mc1322x] 6LowPAN data payload

[Mariano Alvira]

I had this problem a while ago --- there were some changes to tunslip6
to send the prefix. Try deleting tunslip6 and making a new one from
the current source.

-Mar.


On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 01:54:51PM +0200, Joakim Eriksson wrote:
> Ok, so it does not stop waiting when you start tunslip6?
>
> Tunslip is supposed to send a prefix to the border-router, and
> then it should start.
>
> Best regards,
> -- Joakim Eriksson, SICS
>
> Daniel Berenguer skrev 2010-07-18 09:34:
>> OK, so should border-router wait for the prefix until tunslip6 is
>> started... ? This is not the case.
>>
>> Daniel.
>>
>>
>> On 18 July 2010 00:52, Joakim Eriksson<joakime at sics.se>  wrote:
>>> Hello Daniel,
>>>
>>> The prefix is for enabling autoconfiguration of a full IPv6 address
>>> (without hardcoding anything) for all nodes connecting to the network
>>> and to the border-router.
>>>
>>> the full IP is:<prefix>:<802.15.4 MAC address>.
>>>
>>> You will set the prefix if you start the tunslip6 program.
>>> (or you hard-code a prefix instead).
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> -- Joakim Eriksson, SICS
>>>
>>> Daniel Berenguer skrev 2010-07-18 00:45:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Mar and George.
>>>>
>>>> I've finally tested udp-server on my first Econotag with udp-client on
>>>> my second Econotag and everything seems to work just fine. Then,
>>>> uploading border-router into the first Econotag (instead of
>>>> udp-server) disgraces the whole thing:
>>>>
>>>> slip_input_callback is never called after calling slip_send() from
>>>> request_prefix() in border-router.c
>>>> As result, border-router gets blocked in the "Request prefix" loop so
>>>> it will even never respond to a "global repair" button press.
>>>>
>>>> PROCESS_THREAD(border_router_process, ev, data)
>>>> {
>>>> ...
>>>>    /* Request prefix until it has been received */
>>>>    while(!prefix_set) {
>>>>      etimer_set(&et, CLOCK_SECOND);
>>>>      request_prefix();
>>>>      PROCESS_WAIT_EVENT_UNTIL(etimer_expired(&et));
>>>>    }
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> What is the purpose of "requesting the prefix" in border-router?
>>>> Sorry, I know this is an IPv6-related question but I've found very
>>>> little information in the net.
>>>>
>>>> Daniel.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 15 July 2010 23:31, George Lu<lu at goodxense.com>    wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Mariano Alvira<mar at devl.org>    wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you guys know about the global repair button? Pressing S3, KBI0-4
>>>>>> button does "Initiating global repair", which should refresh the
>>>>>> routes etc...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I had tried the global repair button a while ago. Also had a modified
>>>>> rpl-border-router.c that would initiate global repair periodically. I
>>>>> didn't
>>>>> find it effective. But then that was before the big improvement that came
>>>>> with increasing NUM_PACKETS to 32.
>>>>> George
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mc1322x mailing list
>>>> mc1322x at devl.org
>>>> http://devl.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mc1322x
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mc1322x mailing list
>>> mc1322x at devl.org
>>> http://devl.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mc1322x
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mc1322x mailing list
>> mc1322x at devl.org
>> http://devl.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mc1322x
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mc1322x mailing list
> mc1322x at devl.org
> http://devl.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mc1322x